op-ed: Miami Herald: Career-college grads contribute greatly to state’s economy

Career colleges and universities play a major role in educating Florida residents, and the results speak for themselves. In the past five years, more than 500,000 graduates have completed degree and certificate programs for jobs critical to Florida’s economy.

The person who takes your temperature at the doctor’s office, the person at your computer help desk, the person who cuts your hair and the person who prepared your meal most likely graduated in Florida from a career school.

Graduation rates for students in two-year programs at career colleges — the majority of our students — are three times the rates of comparable public two-year institutions, according to the U.S. Department of Education. Our students who earn their bachelor’s degree earn substantially higher incomes than state university graduates as documented by the National Center for Education Statistics last December.

Florida’s private, taxpaying, postsecondary institutions educate more than 60 percent of Florida’s information-technology and healthcare graduates, more than 80 percent of the state’s culinary and commercial truck driver graduates and more than 90 percent of its cosmetology graduates.

The Miami Herald found such a track record unworthy of reporting, but focused instead on 158 student complaints over an 18-month period in three South Florida counties that served over 108,000 students.

Statewide, fewer than one of every thousand student have complained to regulators about any issues regarding their experiences.

The stories in the Herald series Higher Ed Hustle failed to point out that 80 percent of schools have zero complaints filed with regulators.

Every student deserves a high quality education. Valid issues that students face should be resolved. Multiple safeguards exist to assure that this is the case, including those provided by the institution, the independent accrediting body and the state.

Regarding the complaints in question, all were reviewed by the state regulator, the Commission for Independent Education (CIE). The CIE invited the Herald reporter to show one instance in which the law or state regulation was not enforced in any complaint closed by the CIE. The reporter failed to respond. Instead, he chose to retry complaint cases without balancing the story.

The reporter also failed to recognize that, in 2009, the state was facing a looming workforce crisis, forcing the state’s healthcare facilities to actively recruit nurses from other states and foreign countries. After the Florida Center for Nursing projected increasingly large deficits in Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) and Registered Nurses (RNs), the Florida Legislature allowed career colleges to increase their offerings in nursing. There were few dollars in the state budget available to address the need.

Without taxpayer expense, private college students have become a key part of the solution to the critical shortage in nurses. Since 2009, virtually all the growth in nursing in Florida has come from private colleges. Private career colleges and schools produced 10,000 more nurses from 2009 to 2014 than they did in 2008. The state universities and community colleges increased the number of nurses they were producing by fewer than 1,500 over the six-year period.

More than 20,000 educators and college staff work in Florida’s private schools and universities to ensure the success of the students we serve.

Most of our students are not right out of high school, but have jobs and families. Many of them are the first in their families to pursue an education beyond high school.

Our students are adults with adult responsibilities and an adult’s perspective on making the right postsecondary choices. They choose our schools for year-round enrollment, flexible course scheduling, convenient campus locations and online offerings.

We want every student to have the opportunity to work hard and succeed. Their education opens doors that would otherwise be shut.

The Miami Herald used a lot of ink to highlight exceptions to the rule, failing to recognize accomplishments of thousands of productive, working Floridians and their contributions to our state.

Curtis Austin is the executive director of the Florida Association of Postsecondary Schools and Colleges (FAPSC) in Tallahassee, Florida.

Direct link to op-ed: http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/op-ed/article20308563.html

APSCU: Private Sector Institutions Set Up Their Students For Success

04 May 2015 /By APSCU Communications 
 
Experts agree: individuals who decide to further their educations by attending postsecondary institutions are making worthwhile investments that pay off in the long-run. Research shows that individuals who obtain a bachelor’s degree experience a lifetime earnings increase of roughly $1 million compared to individuals with a high school degree.

As has been previously explained on this blog, private sector institutions are no different when it comes to providing students who earn degrees with significant earnings boosts. Many of these students are new traditional students who have been traditionally underserved by public and private nonprofit higher education institutions. Private sector institutions have been more responsive in meeting the needs of these new traditional students, and, as a result, have prepared many individuals to become professionals in high-demand fields.

As seen in the infographic below, a number of metrics support the fact that private sector institutions are increasingly setting their students up for success. By doing so, private sector institutions are justifying the growing number of experts that extol the benefits of an investment in higher education.

APSCU_infographics_v6 Infographic 3


op-ed Miami Herald:Opinion: For-profit colleges’ success ignored

May 02, 2015

I have spent decades at the top of two businesses that were juxtaposed on your front page last week: journalism and for-profit education. I had the honor of being publisher of The Washington Post for more than 20 years and the CEO of the company that owned it for 22. And I now have the equal honor of being CEO of the company that owns Kaplan University, which is one of the many colleges mentioned in your series.

Reading your series has made me sad indeed for one of my two professions.

Every journalist knows that he or she is supposed to report all sides of a story. In this case the reporter wrote an account of his own work — How the Higher Ed Hustle was reported. Every word is devoted to his efforts to learn what critics of the industry had to say. If he lifted a finger to learn whether any for-profit colleges in fact do a good job educating their students, he forgot to say so.

In other words, reporting on a story that has more than one side, the Herald’s reporter wanted to know only one. Every word of his series reeks of this. Every charge — from plaintiffs’ attorneys, former employees who were fired (though the Herald’s readers were not permitted to know they were discharged) and lifelong critics of the industry — is treated reverently. The few scraps of evidence of another side are treated contemptuously. If a politician doesn’t agree with the critics of the industry, it must be because he or she has received a microscopic percentage of his or her campaign contributions from those connected to us. (For the record, neither I nor Kaplan has ever contributed to a Florida politician).

So help me: “Not all students at for-profit colleges have a bad experience” is the start of the first quasi-positive paragraph in the first article — and it appears in the 27th paragraph of a story that begins with a stripper recruiting students to a long-defunct college and goes on to other horror stories. And after that short, lonely paragraph, the horror stories resume. One story (among nine!) about two students who experienced some success at for-profits is presented under the headline Industry Touts Success Stories.

When he contacted Kaplan for comment on some of the material he mentioned in his articles, the reporter said he had been working on the series since July.

The call came in February.

He worked for more than half a year on a story about colleges before he actually called the colleges.
Is there another side to the story? Well …

There are 2 million students attending for-profit colleges. Does the editor of the Miami Herald think that all were tricked or deluded into enrolling? Isn’t it likelier that most were well aware of their alternatives and made what they considered the best choice for them? Isn’t yours (as the Miami-Dade County Teacher of the Year says in the 13th paragraph of one of the articles) a snob’s position — that poor students cannot understand their choices as well as you can?
In fact, they do.
I cannot speak for all the colleges your reporter writes about (though I do not believe a word he writes). Kaplan University is a decent place trying to offer a good education to its students and thereby improve their lives. When we fail (and your reporter points to one student who is disappointed with her education), they and I are bitterly sorry. But it is fair to ask: Is that student typical? How many are disappointed and how many benefit?

Over the last few years, Kaplan University — the same place referred to multiple times in your stories — surveyed all those who have graduated from the school. Not all replied, of course, but more than 17,000 did. This is not a scientific random sample; it’s possible it was disposed toward those who liked the place. But 17,000 people responding to a survey isn’t casual evidence, either. Here is what the most recently surveyed students had to say:

▪ 88.6 percent agreed or strongly agreed with, “Overall I am satisfied with my experience at Kaplan University.”
▪ 84.6 percent said, “I would recommend Kaplan University to others.”
▪ 86.2 percent agreed or strongly agreed with, “The education I received is relevant to my current goals.”

In each case, those who entered “strongly disagree” were between 1 percent and 4 percent.
I don’t know all the people who work at Kaplan University, but I know a lot of them. And for my whole working life I have known great newspaper people. Kaplan’s people, like the Herald’s, came to work there because they felt a sense of mission and a desire to serve others — in your case readers, in ours a particular group of students. (Perhaps because of that sense of mission, Kaplan was just named one of Forbes Magazine’s 100 Best Employers for 2015). I have taught at Kaplan University myself off and on for four years.

The university is something of a Florida success story. It grew (and our company lost many millions of dollars while it was doing so) by satisfying the needs of students who had few or no options elsewhere. Our average student is 33, has a job and a family. It is hard going to a campus if you have a job and a family; online education wasn’t created by for-profits, but the industry popularized it (and was heavily criticized for that, too, before every college in America joined us in offering online courses).

Our students are almost uniformly low-income. They go back to college (many have at least a few credits) because life has taught them they must. Like every high-school principal in Miami-Dade County, Kaplan’s people know that a college degree leads to a much greater chance of success in life.
Reader: The people at Kaplan University — the teachers, the counselors and the administrators — are as dedicated to the success of our students as the other educators you know. Schools that primarily serve low-income students, and we are one, have their challenges. Yes, our students graduate with debt (low-income students must borrow to attend college, and KU’s adult students almost never have parents paying their tuition); many do not graduate (but according to the best information we can gather, KU’s graduation rates are far higher than the average traditional university achieves with students from similar demographic background); they sometimes default (but the default rate among Kaplan University graduates is 4.5 percent).

Much of the series refers to the recruiting practices of for-profit colleges. During a federal investigation in 2010, we learned that one recruiter at a Kaplan College vocational campus had used utterly reprehensible tactics in recruiting a student.

Readers might ask themselves: What would your company do if it was facing such a challenge? Here’s what Kaplan did.

1. We stopped enrollment on the campus for months, until we could assure ourselves that every student in attendance had been admitted properly. Every student was offered a full refund if they wanted to leave. (The vast majority chose to stay.)

2. We adopted a program called The Kaplan Commitment, which offered something no university in the country did: A student could then enroll and take five weeks of classes, drop out any time during the five weeks and owe no tuition and incur no debt.

This program cost us well over $100 million. That’s how badly we wanted to ensure that no student attended Kaplan University because of false recruiting.

That’s how much money we lost — and that’s how much money Kaplan itself (not Kaplan University — the whole of Kaplan) makes in a good year. This was quite an extraordinary act; Your reporter ignored it. And all the information I have cited here is publicly available in obvious places (our SEC filings and Kaplan’s annual report).

I would like to say a last word as a longtime journalist. When a reporter writes only one side of a multi-sided story, such a reporter is normally kept in check by editors. Good editors demand that a reporter get both sides of a story. They do not publish blatantly unfair work. That wasn’t done at the Miami Herald.

The editors of the Herald deserve far more blame for this wretched work than the reporter. It is as if the words “for-profit education” made everyone at the Herald believe that there was no further reporting to be done.

But for-profit businesses can do a great deal of public good.

My Exhibit A would be the Miami Herald, a for-profit newspaper which at one time went to great lengths to give Floridians an honest and balanced view of the place they live.

Donald E. Graham is the chairman and CEO of Graham Holdings Company.

Direct link to op-ed: http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/op-ed/article20052711.html

APSCU: Private Sector Instiutions Prepare the High-Demand Professional for Tomorrow

April 24, 2015
By APSCU Communications 

Private sector institutions prepare students and provide them with relevant skills in high demand career fields. Since 2001, the number of credentials awarded to students attending private sector institutions increased by 165 percent. This means that each year, more and more students are receiving the skills they need to work in high demand fields that boost their earnings potentials.
As seen in the infographic below, private sector institutions award the majority of all allied health and culinary arts credentials earned. Private sector institutions also play a significant role in teaching the skills required to be an electrician or a vehicle maintenance and repair technician.

Private sector institutions provide new traditional students with opportunities to further their educations and obtain skills in career-relevant fields. These new traditional students, who are over the age of 25, have financial dependents, and/or are employed full-time while enrolled, have been vastly underserved by traditional institutions of higher education. Private sector institutions are well equipped to meet the needs of these new traditional students through flexible learning options that public and private nonprofit institutions typically do not provide.

In the infographic below, you can see that private sector institutions are increasingly preparing the high-demand professionals of tomorrow.

APSCU_infographics_v6 Infographic 2


Direct link to article: http://www.highereducationforall.com/private-sector-institutions-prepare-high-demand-professionals-tomorrow/#.VT5Nr5OHeJ9