BY CURTIS AUSTIN
Special to The Tampa Tribune
Published: August 27, 2014
Here are the facts about for-profit higher education in Florida:
♦ More than 500,000 degrees and diplomas were earned by students at career colleges in Florida in the past five years.
♦ Currently, more than 300,000
students are enrolled in Florida in private career colleges, including
45,000 in the Tampa Bay area.
♦ Private colleges and
universities educated 60 percent of the health care graduates and 60
percent of the computer and information technology graduates last year
in Florida.
With more than a half-million people completing degrees —
including 50 percent of those licensed as practical nurses and 20
percent of those licensed as registered nurses — one would think that
analysts would seek to determine if a reported negative experience at a
career college is common to most students.
A recent Tampa Tribune article indicated that 41 percent of
all G.I. Bill dollars were being expended at career colleges and
universities (“For-profit colleges gouging veterans, U.S. Senate report
finds,” Aug. 18). That does not surprise anyone familiar with the
educational programs at these schools. A 2010 survey of veterans by the
Rand Corporation and the American Council in Education indicated those
who selected career colleges did so because of the career-oriented
offerings with flexible schedules, like-minded adult students, flexible
credit transfer rules and campuses in multiple locations.
The Tribune article, repeating criticism often lobbed at
private education, failed to ask why students, including veterans,
choose to attend private career schools.
In most cases, these capable adults, who have defended the
free world in foreign lands and who often are juggling the demands of
family and employment, have chosen the best path for themselves.
ln a changing world, much of higher education delivery is
stuck in a very dated model. The model focuses on traditional students —
those right out of high school, attending full time. It allows students
to enroll only at the beginning of semesters. Students learn in desks
or lecture halls. They learn more stuff unrelated to their occupation
than applies to their chosen careers.
Nontraditional students — married, parents and working adults —
usually don’t have time to learn this way. They enroll throughout the
year in career schools — not just at the beginning of a semester. They
study online or at one of the more than 1,000 locations in Florida. They
have small classes. They don’t stop their education for “summer
vacation.” Most importantly, they spend their time on education directly
related to their career.
Career-oriented adults are increasingly choosing this
educational option. Not only do most health care and computer students
make this choice, but 90 percent of all cosmetology and 83 percent of
culinary students do the same.
The proof that these choices are wise is found in the
graduation statistics. For those students in two-year programs or less,
almost twice as many career college students graduate as compared to
their community college peers.
And if you want a career, graduation matters. The Florida
Legislature has documented that career college graduates make money
roughly equivalent to their community college peers, and the Chronicle
of Higher Education recently reported that employers see little
difference in their educational credentials.
Critics of career colleges almost never visit such schools to
learn firsthand why so many choose to attend. They also often fail to
check with government regulators tasked with determining if the
complaints are legitimate or typical of student experience.
The Florida Commission for Independent Education, an agency
reporting directly to the Florida commissioner of education, regulates
all private career schools in the state.
At the latest commission meeting, Everest University,
criticized in the Tribune article, was brought before the commission to
explain all of the public attention directed at the school.
The director of the commission noted that for all the
newsprint that has been devoted to Everest University, the commission
has not received even one unresolved complaint from a student.
Interesting.
This same commission also checks the placement rates at
licensed schools not already being policed by their accreditors. So we
do know that most of the students get jobs in related careers.
The facts are clear. For many students the nontraditional
choice to attend a career school is the best choice. Their needs are
better met. They are protected. And they finish and work. Ask the
500,000 graduates.
Curtis Austin is the executive director of the Florida Association of Postsecondary Schools and Colleges.
Direct link to article: http://tbo.com/list/news-opinion-commentary/any-doubts-about-career-colleges-ask-the-500000-graduates-20140827/
The Hill: The administration's forced extinction of for-profit colleges
August 15, 2014
By Harry C. Alford, contributor
Imagine if the federal government decided to regulate hospitals and medical clinics by judging them strictly by their ability to achieve specific outcomes for their patients — as opposed to measuring their quality of service — or else funding would be cut off, causing them to close their doors. Moreover, not all hospitals and clinics would be subject to these regulations — just the ones in neighborhoods with older populations, higher percentages of people living in poverty, and larger numbers of Latino and African-American residents.
The scenario above would lead to the closure of hundreds of hospitals which serve the vital role of providing health services to the underserved Americans who need them most. A proposal like this would be lambasted by Americans as outrageous and harmful. However, this is exactly what the U.S. Department of Education has proposed when it comes to college programs throughout the country with its proposed "gainful employment" regulations.
While the administration's conquest of Corinthian Colleges this summer left 72,000 students and 12,000 employees without a clear path forward, those numbers appear paltry when compared to the thousands of employees and millions of students who would be affected by the proposed gainful employment regulations. Various studies have shown that approximately 1 million students are enrolled in programs that will likely lose eligibility for Title IV federal student aid under the proposed regulations, and up to 7.5 million students could lose access by 2024.
As previously noted, the administration claimed ignorance of Corinthian's tenuous finances when it delayed access to the federal funding for students choosing to attend a Corinthian institution of higher education, but those dubious claims have since been exposed as a ploy to cover up the Department of Education's blind zeal for big government. As BuzzFeed revealed in documents provided to the outlet, the department was aware of many of the details of Corinthian's financial situation as recently as May 2014. This revelation — coupled with the department's and the administration's known hostility toward private-sector schools — confirms that the department's assertions are little more than a cover up for its hasty, poorly planned actions.
While the department may be patting itself on the back now, the repercussions of its hasty actions are being felt by the thousands of students who attend Corinthian's schools. These students now face uncertain futures as the department failed to consider a plan to absorb them, as well as the impact to Corinthian’s full-time employees, who will now be forced to seek new alternatives. The department's lack of consideration for this underserved population of the U.S. will be made even clearer if its proposed gainful employment regulations become law, as they are guaranteed to have exponentially more damaging effects.
The prospect of the impact of the gainful employment regulations is more appalling when the demographics of many private-sector institutions are taken into consideration. The majority of students who attend private-sector colleges come predominantly from challenged socioeconomic segments of our communities. Students at for-profits tend to be older than traditional students, are more likely to be minorities and slightly more likely to be female. Many students are already part of the workforce and are twice as likely to have families of their own.
Analysis from Charles River Associates suggest that between 25 and 40 percent of African-American students, between 21 and 39 percent of Hispanic students, and between 24 and 41 percent of female students are enrolled in impacted programs. These are the very individuals, in every corner of our country, who are working to break into the American middle class. They are also people for whom traditional public or non-profit colleges simply aren't an option — either due to costs, schedules, admissions requirements or simply due to choice, a freedom we enjoy in this country the last time I checked.
If the proposed regulations are put in place as currently drafted, there will be a snowball effect. First, students who are reliant on federal financial aid to afford college will be denied access. The resulting reduction in enrollment could shut down entire programs and colleges, thus negatively impacting potentially all students enrolled and studying at the institution of their choosing. Some programs, striving to meet unrealistic metrics to remain viable, will greatly restrict admission of the underserved students who need it most, and only enroll low-risk students. The schools left standing will be no more accessible to underserved students than traditional colleges and universities, public or non-profit.
It won't take long before the American public's outrage against these shortsighted regulations boils forth when millions of students are forced to abandon their dreams of higher education and are stripped of one of their most important options for life improvement.
Alford is the cofounder, president and CEO of the National Black Chamber of Commerce.
Direct link to article: http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/education/215199-the-administrations-forced-extinction-of-for-profit-colleges#ixzz3ATECIGBp
By Harry C. Alford, contributor
Imagine if the federal government decided to regulate hospitals and medical clinics by judging them strictly by their ability to achieve specific outcomes for their patients — as opposed to measuring their quality of service — or else funding would be cut off, causing them to close their doors. Moreover, not all hospitals and clinics would be subject to these regulations — just the ones in neighborhoods with older populations, higher percentages of people living in poverty, and larger numbers of Latino and African-American residents.
The scenario above would lead to the closure of hundreds of hospitals which serve the vital role of providing health services to the underserved Americans who need them most. A proposal like this would be lambasted by Americans as outrageous and harmful. However, this is exactly what the U.S. Department of Education has proposed when it comes to college programs throughout the country with its proposed "gainful employment" regulations.
While the administration's conquest of Corinthian Colleges this summer left 72,000 students and 12,000 employees without a clear path forward, those numbers appear paltry when compared to the thousands of employees and millions of students who would be affected by the proposed gainful employment regulations. Various studies have shown that approximately 1 million students are enrolled in programs that will likely lose eligibility for Title IV federal student aid under the proposed regulations, and up to 7.5 million students could lose access by 2024.
As previously noted, the administration claimed ignorance of Corinthian's tenuous finances when it delayed access to the federal funding for students choosing to attend a Corinthian institution of higher education, but those dubious claims have since been exposed as a ploy to cover up the Department of Education's blind zeal for big government. As BuzzFeed revealed in documents provided to the outlet, the department was aware of many of the details of Corinthian's financial situation as recently as May 2014. This revelation — coupled with the department's and the administration's known hostility toward private-sector schools — confirms that the department's assertions are little more than a cover up for its hasty, poorly planned actions.
While the department may be patting itself on the back now, the repercussions of its hasty actions are being felt by the thousands of students who attend Corinthian's schools. These students now face uncertain futures as the department failed to consider a plan to absorb them, as well as the impact to Corinthian’s full-time employees, who will now be forced to seek new alternatives. The department's lack of consideration for this underserved population of the U.S. will be made even clearer if its proposed gainful employment regulations become law, as they are guaranteed to have exponentially more damaging effects.
The prospect of the impact of the gainful employment regulations is more appalling when the demographics of many private-sector institutions are taken into consideration. The majority of students who attend private-sector colleges come predominantly from challenged socioeconomic segments of our communities. Students at for-profits tend to be older than traditional students, are more likely to be minorities and slightly more likely to be female. Many students are already part of the workforce and are twice as likely to have families of their own.
Analysis from Charles River Associates suggest that between 25 and 40 percent of African-American students, between 21 and 39 percent of Hispanic students, and between 24 and 41 percent of female students are enrolled in impacted programs. These are the very individuals, in every corner of our country, who are working to break into the American middle class. They are also people for whom traditional public or non-profit colleges simply aren't an option — either due to costs, schedules, admissions requirements or simply due to choice, a freedom we enjoy in this country the last time I checked.
If the proposed regulations are put in place as currently drafted, there will be a snowball effect. First, students who are reliant on federal financial aid to afford college will be denied access. The resulting reduction in enrollment could shut down entire programs and colleges, thus negatively impacting potentially all students enrolled and studying at the institution of their choosing. Some programs, striving to meet unrealistic metrics to remain viable, will greatly restrict admission of the underserved students who need it most, and only enroll low-risk students. The schools left standing will be no more accessible to underserved students than traditional colleges and universities, public or non-profit.
It won't take long before the American public's outrage against these shortsighted regulations boils forth when millions of students are forced to abandon their dreams of higher education and are stripped of one of their most important options for life improvement.
Alford is the cofounder, president and CEO of the National Black Chamber of Commerce.
Direct link to article: http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/education/215199-the-administrations-forced-extinction-of-for-profit-colleges#ixzz3ATECIGBp
Tallahassee Democrat: Tom Feeney: Proposal threatens opportunity for students
July 14, 2014
Tom C. Feeney, My View
Pro-growth policies in recent years have sparked an economic turnaround that makes Florida the envy of most states.
Our annual job growth rate of 3.3 percent is the fastest since 2006, and Florida’s month-over-month private sector job growth has been positive for the past 34 consecutive months. Florida businesses have created more than 600,000 jobs since 2010, while the state’s unemployment rate has remained below the national unemployment rate for the last nine consecutive months.
Career colleges advance these positive trends. Their programs are concentrated, streamlined and tightly focused on workforce demand and job availability, utilizing employer councils to ensure that classes and labs reflect current day marketplace needs and future directions. It is no coincidence that career college programs help prepare students for employment in at least 10 of the state’s 20 hottest job categories.
Unfortunately, the U.S. Department of Education has the career college sector squarely in its sights with the proposed “gainful employment” regulation. While the regulation ostensibly is focused on students and schools, its impact on Florida businesses could be substantial. That’s because career colleges supply employers with thousands of skilled, motivated and “job-ready” applicants every year. As such, these institutions help Florida businesses in health care, information technology, hospitality and other high-demand employment areas grow by fueling the talent pipeline.
The proposed gainful employment regulation will force schools to cut programs if their graduates are unable to meet a set of arbitrary salary and loan repayment thresholds. While the regulatory language includes all postsecondary institutions offering certificate and two-year career education programs, make no mistake about it: The higher, non-taxpayer subsidized tuition costs of career colleges make them squarely (and unfairly) the government’s target.
This is a federal regulation, but its effects will be felt at the state level. Consider the impact in Florida, where more than 1,000 career college campuses are educating more than 300,000 students — almost one in five of all 12-month enrollments. The government estimates that the proposed rule, due to take effect soon, will impact about 20 percent of programs immediately. Another 10 percent of programs would be relegated to the department’s putative penalty box, a gray zone of possible sanctions sure to cast a chill on new student enrollments.
The Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities (APSCU) recently released a report finding that the regulation could impact up to 44 percent of career college students. In Florida, the new rule would have the potential to push 132,000 students out of higher education.
In tampering with talent availability, the Department of Education threatens slowdowns in key sectors of the Florida economy. Just consider the following:
• Health care will account for almost one in four jobs over the next 10 years. In the retirement-attractive Sunshine State, 17 percent of residents are 65 years old or older. More than 60 percent of health care graduates in Florida are educated at career schools.
• A study by TechAmerica ranks Florida No. 3 for high-tech establishments and No. 5 for high-tech employment. Florida career colleges produce over 60 percent of in-state information technology graduates.
• Florida hosts almost 95 million visitors a year. Career colleges educate 83 percent of Florida’s culinary arts graduates.
Career colleges also help ensure the availability of a workforce that is as diverse as it is well-skilled and job ready. Twenty-two percent of Florida’s career college graduates are African-Americans, compared with 17 percent for all institutions; for Latino students it’s 30 percent, compared with 22 percent for all institutions.
The constructive contribution of career colleges to a more diverse, better-prepared Florida workforce explains why more than 100 leaders across the state, including the Associated Industries of Florida, the Florida Hospital Association and the Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association, have joined together to oppose the U.S. Department of Education’s proposed gainful employment regulation. Many in Congress are likewise opposed, including Florida members of Congress U.S. Reps. Alcee Hastings, Ted Deutch, Lois Frankel and Joe Garcia.
Student loan debt is an important problem, and solving it is an important national priority. Lending issues are not, however, limited to career college students. To make real headway, we need less scapegoating and more systematic assessment. Meanwhile, widely available career college access means more skills for Florida workers, better opportunities to grow Florida businesses and a more vibrant economy overall.
Direct link to article: http://www.tallahassee.com/story/opinion/columnists/2014/07/14/tom-feeney-proposal-threatens-opportunity-students/12550413/
Tom C. Feeney, My View
Pro-growth policies in recent years have sparked an economic turnaround that makes Florida the envy of most states.
Our annual job growth rate of 3.3 percent is the fastest since 2006, and Florida’s month-over-month private sector job growth has been positive for the past 34 consecutive months. Florida businesses have created more than 600,000 jobs since 2010, while the state’s unemployment rate has remained below the national unemployment rate for the last nine consecutive months.
Career colleges advance these positive trends. Their programs are concentrated, streamlined and tightly focused on workforce demand and job availability, utilizing employer councils to ensure that classes and labs reflect current day marketplace needs and future directions. It is no coincidence that career college programs help prepare students for employment in at least 10 of the state’s 20 hottest job categories.
Unfortunately, the U.S. Department of Education has the career college sector squarely in its sights with the proposed “gainful employment” regulation. While the regulation ostensibly is focused on students and schools, its impact on Florida businesses could be substantial. That’s because career colleges supply employers with thousands of skilled, motivated and “job-ready” applicants every year. As such, these institutions help Florida businesses in health care, information technology, hospitality and other high-demand employment areas grow by fueling the talent pipeline.
The proposed gainful employment regulation will force schools to cut programs if their graduates are unable to meet a set of arbitrary salary and loan repayment thresholds. While the regulatory language includes all postsecondary institutions offering certificate and two-year career education programs, make no mistake about it: The higher, non-taxpayer subsidized tuition costs of career colleges make them squarely (and unfairly) the government’s target.
This is a federal regulation, but its effects will be felt at the state level. Consider the impact in Florida, where more than 1,000 career college campuses are educating more than 300,000 students — almost one in five of all 12-month enrollments. The government estimates that the proposed rule, due to take effect soon, will impact about 20 percent of programs immediately. Another 10 percent of programs would be relegated to the department’s putative penalty box, a gray zone of possible sanctions sure to cast a chill on new student enrollments.
The Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities (APSCU) recently released a report finding that the regulation could impact up to 44 percent of career college students. In Florida, the new rule would have the potential to push 132,000 students out of higher education.
In tampering with talent availability, the Department of Education threatens slowdowns in key sectors of the Florida economy. Just consider the following:
• Health care will account for almost one in four jobs over the next 10 years. In the retirement-attractive Sunshine State, 17 percent of residents are 65 years old or older. More than 60 percent of health care graduates in Florida are educated at career schools.
• A study by TechAmerica ranks Florida No. 3 for high-tech establishments and No. 5 for high-tech employment. Florida career colleges produce over 60 percent of in-state information technology graduates.
• Florida hosts almost 95 million visitors a year. Career colleges educate 83 percent of Florida’s culinary arts graduates.
Career colleges also help ensure the availability of a workforce that is as diverse as it is well-skilled and job ready. Twenty-two percent of Florida’s career college graduates are African-Americans, compared with 17 percent for all institutions; for Latino students it’s 30 percent, compared with 22 percent for all institutions.
The constructive contribution of career colleges to a more diverse, better-prepared Florida workforce explains why more than 100 leaders across the state, including the Associated Industries of Florida, the Florida Hospital Association and the Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association, have joined together to oppose the U.S. Department of Education’s proposed gainful employment regulation. Many in Congress are likewise opposed, including Florida members of Congress U.S. Reps. Alcee Hastings, Ted Deutch, Lois Frankel and Joe Garcia.
Student loan debt is an important problem, and solving it is an important national priority. Lending issues are not, however, limited to career college students. To make real headway, we need less scapegoating and more systematic assessment. Meanwhile, widely available career college access means more skills for Florida workers, better opportunities to grow Florida businesses and a more vibrant economy overall.
Tom C. Feeney is president and chief executive officer of the Associated Industries of Florida (aif.com).
Direct link to article: http://www.tallahassee.com/story/opinion/columnists/2014/07/14/tom-feeney-proposal-threatens-opportunity-students/12550413/
Miami Herald: Don’t hobble students at career colleges
July 08, 2014
By Curtis Austin
www.FAPSC.org
Education reform in South Florida deserves high marks, with struggling inner-city high schools, once so-called dropout factories, turning into innovation laboratories. According to a recent report in the Miami Herald, the number of graduating seniors has increased even as enrollment has gone down. High schools in Miami-Dade and Broward counties are taking progressive steps to turn more of their students into graduates. This should help the area sustain its impressive gains in payroll employment for years to come.
Unfortunately, misguided public policy may spoil this bright upside. The U.S. Department of Education is in the process of erecting barriers to the type of career education that helps many college students make the transition from classroom to job site. While everyone knows of University of Miami, Florida International University and Miami Dade College, few people realize that 108,000 students in South Florida attend career colleges. These are working men and women, often single parents, more often than not financially disadvantaged.
They choose career colleges because they are looking to master in-demand skills, a quick return to the workforce and the chance to build sustainable middle-class careers. South Florida’s immigrant population, in particular, has found career colleges a path to the middle class.
The Department of Education has other ideas. The Department’s proposed Gainful Employment regulation would close many career-college programs if graduates do not meet an arbitrary set of income and student-loan debt repayment thresholds. The regulation does not apply to degree programs at state universities or state colleges or at not-for-profit private schools, unfairly targeting programs in career colleges and the students they serve.
Career colleges are not taxpayer subsidized and, as a result, charge tuition that reflects the true cost of providing education. Many career-college students have previously tried community college. At career colleges, they succeed because they find the small classes, flexible schedules that let them keep working, hands-on learning, modern facilities and other educational supports they need to complete their academic programs.
The Gainful Employment regulation would harm many of these students by limiting their access to higher education. A report released by the Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities (APSCU) finds that the regulation could affect up to 44 percent of career college students. In South Florida, that could close the door to post-secondary opportunity for more than 47,500 students every year.
Career colleges educate 60 percent of all healthcare graduates and 60 percent of all information technology graduates in Florida. Sideline almost 50,000 motivated, skilled and job-ready applicants and the impacts on the Miami area’s talent pipeline will be enormous.
Leaders across the state, including Associated Industries of Florida, the Florida Hospital Association and the Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association, have registered their opposition to the Department of Education rule. They are not alone. In Congress, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, including Florida Reps. Alcee Hastings, Ted Deutch, Lois Frankel and Joe Garcia, also oppose the Department’s clear misstep.
Early in his first term, President Obama challenged the nation to recapture its position as a world leader in post-secondary education attainment. The president rightly foresaw that an educated workforce is critical to a globally competitive economy. The availability of such a workforce is especially important to South Florida’s trade-oriented employment marketplace. The Department of Education’s Gainful Employment regulation runs contrary to the president’s lofty goal.
There are, of course, positive steps that could help borrowers better manage student-loan debt. President Obama recently stated his intention to expand the use of income-based repayment programs. Other options include:
• Limiting student loans to educational needs — tuition, books and fees — rather than the total amount students may be eligible to borrow based on federal formulas.
• Improving the budgeting and student-loan repayment counseling provided to borrowers. Students need to clearly understand their obligations and alternatives for managing debt responsibly.
• Leveling the playing field by applying post-secondary reforms to all colleges and universities, not unfairly disadvantaging one sector over others. The Department of Education has turned a blind eye to the fact that in the 21st century, career preparation has become a major expectation of all post-secondary education institutions, not just career colleges.
• Reducing student-loan lending rates. Census data indicate the lifetime earnings of college graduates are over twice those earned with a high school diploma alone. Given the return on investment to the federal treasury, government should craft student-aid policies that encourage college attendance, not allow it to become a risk-laden financial burden.
The proposed Gainful Employment Regulation harms students and businesses. Let’s take an innovation lab approach to student-loan debt.
Curtis Austin is the executive director of the Florida Association of Postsecondary Schools and Colleges.
Direct link to article: http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/07/07/4223218/dont-hobble-students-at-career.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)